By Noah E. Friedkin
This booklet describes how a community of interpersonal impression can function to shape agreements between individuals who occupy various positions in a bunch or association. It offers an account of consensus formation that's particular in its integration of labor from the fields of social psychology and sociology eager about staff dynamics and social buildings.
Read or Download A Structural Theory of Social Influence (Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences) PDF
Similar social psychology & interactions books
Indigenous psychology is an rising new box in psychology, targeting mental universals in social, cultural, and ecological contexts - place to begin for psychologists who desire to comprehend quite a few cultures from their very own ecological, historial, philosophical, and non secular views
*Can theory-driven interventions utilizing social cognition types swap healthiness behaviour? * How may still theoretical versions be tailored for intervention? * What are the results for coverage and perform? for a few years, social cognition versions were on the vanguard of analysis into predicting and explaining wellbeing and fitness behaviours.
The decline in social cohesion, the fragmentation of communal values and a growing to be experience of 'I' instead of 'we', are all symptoms of an inversion of ethical certitudes, a disconnection from fact. This publication asks what equipment can we have at our disposal to appreciate and opposite this breakdown of conversation inside and among groups.
- The Origins of Virtue: Human Instincts and the Evolution of Cooperation
- The Robbers Cave Experiment: Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation. [Orig. pub. as Intergroup Conflict and Group Relations]
- Challenges in the Social Life of Language
- Handbook of Communication and Social Interaction Skills (Routledge Communication Series)
- The American Paradox: Spiritual Hunger in an Age of Plenty
- What Might Have Been: The Social Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking
Extra info for A Structural Theory of Social Influence (Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences)
97) With respect to institutionalized status characteristics, the actor typically encounters inconsistency (guidelines and norms point the actor in different directions), conflict (actors with some influence on the focal actor have conflicting opinions), and ambiguity (expectations are incomplete or insufficient so that the appropriate action is uncertain). Merton and Barber (1976) argue that these features of the institutionalized components of social structures do not indicate an absence of social organization but are manifestations of a special type of social organization, which they refer to as sociological ambivalence.
To be sure, bureaucracies vary in the degree of constraint they exert on the behavior of actors; moreover, strongly constraining social structures are not found exclusively in bureaucracies. Two conditions appear especially important for the maintenance of a strongly constraining social structure, and they have been repeatedly emphasized in the literature. First, there is a clear demarcation between the individual and positional (organizational) personality, so that a circumscribed domain of behavior and opinion is constrained.
One must look hard, in both the past and present literature in social psychology, for theoretical models of the social influence process that account for the emergence of collective decisions and opinions in natural settings and that take into account the network of interpersonal influences in this process (French 1956; Davis 1973; Latane 1981). Early studies of opinion formation dealt with special cases of influence networks in which an actor is faced with a fixed consensus of opinion that the actor must either conform to or reject (Asch 1951, 1956).