By Ofra Magidor
Classification error are sentences equivalent to 'Green principles sleep furiously' or 'Saturday is in bed'. They strike us as hugely infelicitous however it is difficult to give an explanation for accurately why this is often so. Ofra Magidor explores 4 methods to class errors in philosophy of language and linguistics, and develops and defends an unique, presuppositional account.
Read Online or Download Category mistakes PDF
Best semantics books
Cet ouvrage suggest de jeter un nouveau regard sur des questions qui sont au cœur des problématiques de linguistique française étudiés dans les Cahiers Chronos. Plusieurs auteurs étudient des questions de temps et d'aspect (Apothéloz & Nowakowska, Haas & Huyghe, Lauze, Lebas-Fraczak, Moline, Provôt ; Deslés & Vinzerich) ou des emplois modaux (Engel ; Forsgren & Sullet-Nylander, Lansari, Morency, Patard & Vermeulen).
During this number of articles, the writer displays at the nature of language, the paintings of lexicography and the advancements in verbal exchange, the media and data know-how within the overdue twentieth century. the 3 major matters checked out are: language at huge, and particulary English, the main accepted language within the heritage of the area; the paintings and examine of dictionaries and reference technological know-how, embracing all previous, current and capability reference fabrics - from the "OED" to the "Yellow Pages"; and the procedures in which verbal exchange, info and information has evoloved - from cave paintings to the private machine.
The virtually entire omit of the verse epic as a style nonetheless valuable of significant dialogue and earnest research is all too obvious in German literary feedback. the single try to view the style in its evolution in the course of the centuries is Heinrich Maiworm's priceless yet inevitably just a little perfunctory old survey of the German epic which seemed within the moment quantity of Deutsche Philologie im Auf,iss.
Drawing at the conceptual equipment of cognitive grammar, this article goals to carry order into the array of makes use of through delivering a unified semantic characterization of the dative case which subsumes either "lexically ruled" and "free" datives.
- Algebraic Semantics in Language and Philosophy (Center for the Study of Language and Information - Lecture Notes)
- Disinventing and Reconstituting Languages (Bilingual Education & Bilingualism)
- The American Rhetorical Construction of the Iranian Nuclear Threat
- Constructionalization and Constructional Changes (Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics)
- From Utterances to Speech Acts
Additional info for Category mistakes
29 Fodor (1977), p. 98. See Jackendoff (1972), pp. 18–19 for a similar argument. 39 THE SYNTACTIC APPROACH The problem with such cases is the following. One might envisage a syntactic theory where, for example, ‘is pregnant’ requires an argument with the syntactic feature ‘+female’, and where ‘man’ is marked with the feature ‘−female’. But it is hard to see how any such theory could possibly account for the infelicity of (18). The fact that the noun phrase in (18) represents a person which is not female depends, among other things, on the very specific meanings of ‘prove’ (in particular, that it is factive), and ‘mistaken’ (in particular, that it is anti-factive) and on highly complex interactions between these meanings.
135. The duplication complaint is also reiterated in a slightly different context in Grimshaw (1979), p. 317. 36 THE ARGUMENT FROM PARTICUL AR IT Y features. Perhaps then, the worry is better understood as the complaint that given the semantic-values, the syntactic features are redundant? 3: there are cases where we would want to classify a certain class of features as syntactic, even though these features are fully determined by semantic properties. Syntactic features are those which play a distinctive role in our theory of syntax, independently of what our meta-syntactic theory claims about their relationship to semantic features.
But some care is needed in pinning down precisely what the problem with such a treatment is. One worry might be that adding so many features will make for a highly complicated theory of syntax. 1. 23 The worry is that the proliferation of highly particularized syntactic features would entail that syntax essentially encodes the same lexical information as semantics, in effect collapsing the distinction between syntax and semantics, or the need for both facets of linguistic theorizing. Take for example the syntactic feature ‘+matrix’.